(Wersja PL poniżej EN)
There’s a cheeky phrase that’s been floating around tech circles lately: CIO stands for “Career Is Over.” Depending on your mood (and maybe your last board meeting), it might even get a knowing chuckle. But let’s hold the sarcasm and get real for a second—because the truth is more nuanced. In fact, what’s “over” is not the CIO role itself, but the clarity of C-level roles altogether.
The C-Suite Explosion
Remember when there were just a few folks sitting around the top floor boardroom table? The CEO, CFO, COO, and perhaps a CIO or CTO. Back then, the lines were clear. Strategy, operations, finance, and tech. Easy.
Today? Welcome to the age of C-Level Overpopulation.
Here’s a snapshot of current job title inflation:
• Chief Technology Officer (CTO)
• Chief Information Officer (CIO)
• Chief Digital Officer (CDO)
• Chief Innovation Officer (CInO)
• Chief AI Officer (CAIO)
• Chief Product Officer (CPO)
• Chief Experience Officer (CXO)
• Chief Growth Officer (CGO)
• Chief Revenue Officer (CRO)
• Chief People Officer (CPO — yes, again)
• Chief Customer Officer (CCO)
• Chief Transformation Officer
• Chief Data Officer
• Chief Knowledge Officer
• Chief Happiness Officer (really)
• Chief Storytelling Officer (we’re still trying to figure that one out)
The list goes on. In fact, a 2023 survey revealed over 60 unique C-level titles in common use across modern companies, many of which are, frankly, indistinguishable in purpose or scope.
When Everyone Is “Chief,” Who Owns the Ship?
While it’s tempting to roll our eyes at some of these titles, the implications run deeper than simple corporate vanity.
The proliferation of chief titles isn’t just silly—it’s operationally risky. These roles, especially when misdefined or overlapping, dilute accountability.
Take this common scenario:
• A company has a CTO, Chief AI Officer, and a Chief Product Officer.
• The CTO has long been responsible for core technologies, including AI.
• The Chief AI Officer now wants a say in infrastructure and tooling.
• The Chief Product Officer expects control over technical implementation because the product experience depends on it.
So who owns AI? Who sets the direction, the budget, the implementation? The org chart might say “shared responsibility,” but shared responsibility without clarity is no responsibility at all.
CTO vs. Chief AI Officer: A Case Study in Confusion
Let’s unpack this further. The CTO has historically been the steward of technology in the organization. Whether it’s cloud infrastructure, developer tooling, cybersecurity, or (yes) AI capabilities, it’s their house.
The Chief AI Officer—a relatively recent phenomenon—can easily end up being a symbolic or ego-driven hire, especially in organizations scrambling to be “AI-ready.” Unless the company is a deep AI research lab or an AI-first product business, the role often lacks substance.
Why create this new role when the AI agenda could and should be owned by the CTO, working closely with the CPO to align with business needs? Often the answer is simple: a desire to show off a “Chief” title.
Why It Happens: Ego, Incentives, and… Budgets
Let’s get even more honest.
Many small and mid-sized companies can’t afford to pay Silicon Valley-level comp packages. But they can give someone a title. A “Chief of Something” has a nice ring to it and can be cheaper than a raise. The problem? It also creates silos and posturing, not impact.
Organizations sometimes treat titles like party favors: “You’re important? Here’s a C-title.” But this erodes the significance of truly strategic leadership roles and blurs the hierarchy that’s critical when decisions must be made quickly and decisively.
When It Works: Smart Consolidation
There are exceptions.
Sometimes, combining titles and responsibilities actually makes sense. A Chief Product & Technology Officer (CPTO), for instance, might own both product vision and the technology roadmap—especially when digital products are core to the business.
This unified model works best when the individual truly has cross-functional expertise and when the company’s size and complexity don’t require a strict separation of concerns. In such cases, the title reflects real responsibility, not résumé fluff.
Down the Ladder: The Title Game Doesn’t Stop at the Top
It’s not just the C-suite. The title game is alive and well across the org chart.
Here are some real (and really baffling) examples of job titles floating out there:
• Digital Prophet
• Wizard of Light Bulb Moments
• Chief Evangelist for Internal Culture Transformation
• Senior Manager of Project Management Operations and Strategy
• Brand Warrior
• Director of First Impressions (aka receptionist)
• VP of Getting Things Done
• Idea Alchemist
Sure, some are meant to be fun or creative. But others are simply attempts to inflate scope or mask unclear responsibilities.
Final Thought: Let’s Bring the “Chief” Back to Earth
Titles matter. Not just because they reflect rank, but because they signal responsibility, accountability, and clarity.
If you’re a founder or executive tempted to sprinkle chief titles across your org like confetti, pause and ask:
• What problem does this title solve?
• Who else owns a piece of that responsibility?
• Will this create clarity—or chaos?
Let’s not let “Career Is Over” become a self-fulfilling prophecy for CIOs, CTOs, or any other executive role. The answer isn’t more titles. It’s better definitions, clearer accountability, and less ego.
